Estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer (ER+ BC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, but the evolutionary processes shaping genetic variation in ER+ BC risk are poorly understood. Here, we explore evidence for antagonistic pleiotropy between ER+ BC risk and human life-history traits, testing whether increased genetic ER+ BC risk is indicative of life-history trade-offs, and is associated with faster maturation, earlier reproduction, and/or increased reproductive success. We estimate genome-wide genetic correlations between ER+ BC risk and three life-history traits (age at menarche, age at first birth, and the number of children born) for Lifelines biobank women using genomic restricted maximum likelihood analyses. We complement these by - for the first time - performing linkage disequilibrium score regression on European family-based genome-wide association study data. Regardless of the data or method used, genetic correlations were low and not statistically different from zero. Thus, we find no evidence for antagonistic pleiotropy between ER+ BC risk and life-history traits, suggesting that these germline mutations have instead accumulated due to weak selection at older ages. Our quantitative genetic analyses suggest that previous results showing antagonistic pleiotropy for individual genetic variants do not replicate when accounting for these traits\' polygenic nature and that observed phenotypic trends do not have a genetic underpinning. While we find no evidence for life-history trade-offs shaping genetic risk for ER+ BC, our rigorous approach may provide a template for future studies to test the role of life-history trade-offs in shaping genetic risk for other diseases.