A distinct feature of living systems is their capacity to take decisions based on uncertain environmental signals. Examples span from the microscopic scale of cells differentiating based on the concentration of a morphogene, to the macroscopic scale of decisions by animals or human beings. The current paradigm in decision theory is based on the assumption that decisions, once taken, cannot be revoked. However, living systems often amend their decisions if accumulated evidence favors an alternative hypothesis. In this paper, we develop a theory for amendable decision making in living systems. We find that, in contrast with irrevocable decisions, optimal amendable decisions can be taken in a finite average time at zero error probability. Our theory successfully predicts the outcome of a visual experiment involving human participants and the accuracy of cell-fate decisions in early development. These case studies demonstrate the broad applicability of the amendable decision paradigm in biology.